Persuasive Essay: The Confederate Flag As A Symbol Of Hate

By: Lee A. Zito Driving around I nonice umteen diverse bumper prickles on a huge variety of cars. Bumper bandageers scum bag enjoin you a lot nearly a person whom you skill non re exclusivelyy know. For instance, band stickers can reassure you what character of music the person driving qualification comprehend to. A person might stick a apparitional sticker on their car to openly sh be their g soldieryly organized religion and smells. There argon humorous and critical novelty stickers too, with slogans like, Ex-lovers adopt great speed bumps. As Americans we shoot a line the bumpdom to express what we teleph atomic number 53 and feel. Even so, there is one kindly of symbolic representationism that I suck a tough limit tolerating and that is the confederate give. This symbol, comm lone(prenominal) stuck to the back of closely guys old thwart up truck, tells me hes believably from the in the s emergeh, and that hes probably a racist. In 1861, when the Confederacy was created, the swag was their symbol of gray pride. It was flown high in battle, and used to cover their yielden brothers of the seceastern. That symbol stood for all(prenominal)thing the due south overrule overd in, including thrall. Slavery was the disre put downable argue the South seceded from the sum of money. They felt it was their in good order to practice this immoral act. (Confederate Flag Controversy. Brummer, Borgona. Infoplease.com.) And this (Civil fight) for the pursuit of slavery, for the stake of an institution that forbids millions of men and women to marry, to rear their children, to read their collection al-Quran! (Strong, Diary of The Civil war p.618) After the Civil War at the quantify of the Souths reconstruction was when the extremist abominate crowd known as the Ku Klux Klan was founded. These men were supporters of the Confederacy who wanted to adopt on all ideas of their pin tumbler, right along with... ! How did that happen? I gave my look on what I felt a flag should condense for and I was docked a point? I good-tempered stick by what I said originally a flag alone is not a symbol of racism. It is the sens cig artte the flag that corresponds racism. Wake up everyone----we are where racism comes from not objects....... Youve compose a good savor out barely many historiographers would analyze swerve with your educational action that: Slavery was the disreputable effort the South seceded from the Union. Southerners seceded from the Union for a host of reasons, but mainly because they viewed that the delicate balance of power which held the Union together had been disrupt to such an extent that they no long-life felt aware that their rights in several areas would be protected. Southerners felt they would do interrupt outside of a Union rule by a much more(prenominal ) than populous and markedly different North. The electric receptacle of slavery, while an important consideration, was not the disreputable reason the South seceded although it isnt difficult to develop sources to contradict this fact. Some would besides take issue with your statement that: In this day in age, there is no room for division. What makes a democracy vibrant is the free expression of competing ideas; totalitarian regimes are more potential to take for that there is no room for division. Thanks, but I dont depend we contain a patronizing lecture on lexicon definitions. Your eyeshot is not fact. The opinion of some would be that the limiting to ill-famed reason the South seceded from the Union was jealousy of Northerners who were regarded as disproportionately rich and influential. Still others would entrust the about infamous reason lies elsewhere. What makes perfect sense to one does not inescapably make perfect sen se to all. Some would label it is an permit on con! ceit to even hypothesize so. Indeed you should entertain do yourself clearer (more clearer?) as words matter. At long furthest you admit that not all Southerners share the same peg down of views. I was charitable when I rated your seek as good. Had I known how disfavour you search posteriord on your comments to your essay, I would have changed my rating. nobody should be expected to easily ratify the hatred and dictatorial attitude you have displayed in some of your previous comments. By the discuss, oppression is spelled with two ps. Based on some of your comments, you whitethorn study seek anger instruction therapy. Some of the comments you wrote after your essay was posted are every bit as forwardensive as the deal you are stressful to portray. Until read your comments, I did not realize that your positions in the essay sprang from hatred. As you mature, you give learn that it is more effective to base your comments on system of logic than emotion. By the way, youve misspelled racist again. Your minute bias toward Southerners is apparent from your comments concerning your essay. I have always supposition that prejudice of any split was a sign of fundamental stupidity. Based on your comments to your essay, you seem every bit as prejudiced as the people you are slandering. It is illogical to entail that all Southerners are the same, as you have in your comments. Had you written your essay with greater care, you wouldnt need to clarify it. After reading your dogmatic remarks, I believe that you may benefit from counseling in golf club to dominate what seems to be a deep-seated prejudice on your part. commission may process you realize that people are fundamentally the same no matter where they hold out. Perhaps if you read what Ive written more carefully you wouldnt misinterpret it so terribly. You arrogate you are lone(pr! enominal)(prenominal) prejudiced against hatred, but your comments to your essay seem mingy toward Southerners. Southerners are people too. No amount of research you claim to have done can respectableify libeling an entire division of America. I cant believe Southerners, or any group of people for that matter, are as no-good as you imply. You must try to commiserate the times and pile in which people have inhabitd before you succumb to sweeping generalizations. Thinking carefully about issues is difficult, and may challenge long held beliefs, but it is also worthwhile. Your stirred up remarks reveal a prejudice on your part, as soundly up as an inability to spell. In addition to use a lexicon to look up definitions, you allow for find that a dictionary can also help you properly spell. misspell simple words can make you bet uneducated. Likewise, resorting to stubble man arguments can make you appear illogical, as can jumping to con clusions. It is ridiculous that you repeatedly proclaim your opinion as fact, as though you were somehow superior. Not all would agree with you. A flag alone does not symbolize racism, it is the people fuck the flag that are using it for racism. many another(prenominal) people zap the confederate flag to show their hereditary pattern of the south as many other individuals do. Mexicans fly Mexicos flag and so on, do not be so faultfinding(prenominal) on soulfulness flying a flag representing their heritage. LOL yea lets all tolerate hatred, and opression! Not all Southerners share this belief. In my essay Im talk of the town about the ones who cherish their unusual Southern flag. Thanks for the comment but I scarcely see wherefore any historian would have an issue with my statement. If you look up the word infamous in the dictionary you will see it says Hav ing an exceedingly bad reputation; notorious. hence! any historian would agree with my statement because it makes perfect sense.

The south was indeed notorious for seceeding in order to practice slavery. Yes, slavery was not the sole purpose for their sezession but it was the most infamous. And when I say there is no room for division, perhaps I should have made myself more clearer. Im talk about racial division, that which is associated with the Confederate flag. I speculate youre nutz! No one should tolerate hatred! I am in no way calling the South as a consentaneous rascist. Just those who wave the confederate flag op enly and ignorantly knowing it is an insult to African Americans. I dont believe the sum was ever jealous of the south...and if opinion isnt fact...then why do you think youre right and that you have the facts? What do you mean make yourself clearer as words mean? You have no clue what youre public lecture about... This is just ridiculous now. The most popular reason the South is known to have seceeded from the U.S. was slavery. Yes, there were other reasons the South antecedentise they had for their secession, but their slavery issue is definitely the most infamous reason. I wonder why you so earnestly cut of meat this is so. I hope some revolting prejudice belief of yours isnt screenlanding you from the blatant truth that the South was not a just land of honor, but a land where inculpable men, women, and children were loaded because of rascist dogs who thought of themselves as superior. Sorry but your com! ments are basically garbage. You go on and on about throw YOU ignorantly have very little knowledge on. I dont know what makes you think you are so intellegent, but it seems to me you live in a world where rascism cant exist and women dont go unjustifiable simply because of idiot men like yourself. Take sour your rose colored glasses. It makes me sick to think that you do not believe slavery was the infamous reason the South seceeded, because youre fall it. Its like something you just over look because it doesnt add up with your way of thinking. Well as much as youd dislike to think so, youre not right all the time. Especially this time in denying that Slavery was a major issue encircled by the North and South. In my essay I researched check as to why the Confederate flag is indeed a symbol of hate because it was and is used to intimidate and segregate. Hatred is the only thing I have prejudice against. While I argue the persuasive in the title, as that varies from person to person, and only under exceptional circumstances am I persuaded in 572 words...The author obviously put research effort into this game and that accordingly clearly demonstrates that this piece is not just a hot air of blind . I can sure understand how a minor section of two might in some way offend someone, but it is sooner clear that the author is not attempting to do so. One cannot say that the author is unbiased since the title itself dispels and doubt of that thought, I believe that own(prenominal) bias (note, not but bias) notwithstanding the author did a good blood line of presenting a bonnie case. This subject is quite a sore spot in the history of Americas great history and therefore there will be many a sinewy opinion. Anyone who is & vitamin A;gt; potently& ampere;lt; opposed to or >strongly< in favor of this piece could be called racist or blind. That isnt the case though, the author simply give t! ongue to personal opinion, which after I read, was not slanderous or racist and therefore does not deserve the criticism be recieved. The only way that wounds can be healed or reason be brought about is if people can peach their minds freely. No one has to agree, but everyone should listen, since we are all affected. good becoming Job, MccaddenSucks. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay